I have some comments from a reader which I will try to answer:
felicity, I benefited from reading your blog articles, so here's my take on AirAsia.
1. Look at their free cash flow http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/airasia/financials/cash-flow
Taking a long-term perspective, return to shareholders is simply discounted sum of free cash flow. Profit is an opinion, cash is real.
I have been a proponent of free cashflow in my blog and did I change my strategy and investment methods. No. It is accurate that Airasia has not been strong in its cashflow department over the last few years but if one is to read further, Airasia has been on growth path before and they have actually slowed down their growth since 2015. For 2015, one will see a net free cashflow of more than RM1 billion and that is before they have started to fully enjoy the much lower fuel price. Most airlines (except for many American airlines) had yet to enjoy the lower fuel costs. 2016 will be year where the lower fuel will start to provide the additional profits. Airasia's business generates real cash.
2. AirAsia has over $11B ringgit in debt. http://www.airasia.com/my/en/about-us/ir-5-year-financial-highlights.page
Sure, they have plenty of planes. But planes can't be sold otherwise, they would have to close shop. Even if they reduce their planes, they probably won't get a good price (see point 3).
Debt is definitely high. They have to work on it before it becomes overly burdensome. However, they are not in the business of selling planes but seats. Most tend to think what if it closes down. It is a business. They do sell old planes and buy new ones. On that part the narrow body planes are much better situation than wide body planes. Example A380 or B777 will have problem to be sold, not so A320.
3. There is a overcapacity in the airlines industry currently (as MAS's new CEO pointed out during a recent interview).
Wonder why you think AirAsia should be worth US$10B someday? Did you do a discounted free cash flow analysis or just compared them to valuations of other budget carriers?
Just look at the trend as seen below.
felicity, I benefited from reading your blog articles, so here's my take on AirAsia.
1. Look at their free cash flow http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/airasia/financials/cash-flow
Taking a long-term perspective, return to shareholders is simply discounted sum of free cash flow. Profit is an opinion, cash is real.
I have been a proponent of free cashflow in my blog and did I change my strategy and investment methods. No. It is accurate that Airasia has not been strong in its cashflow department over the last few years but if one is to read further, Airasia has been on growth path before and they have actually slowed down their growth since 2015. For 2015, one will see a net free cashflow of more than RM1 billion and that is before they have started to fully enjoy the much lower fuel price. Most airlines (except for many American airlines) had yet to enjoy the lower fuel costs. 2016 will be year where the lower fuel will start to provide the additional profits. Airasia's business generates real cash.
2. AirAsia has over $11B ringgit in debt. http://www.airasia.com/my/en/about-us/ir-5-year-financial-highlights.page
Sure, they have plenty of planes. But planes can't be sold otherwise, they would have to close shop. Even if they reduce their planes, they probably won't get a good price (see point 3).
Debt is definitely high. They have to work on it before it becomes overly burdensome. However, they are not in the business of selling planes but seats. Most tend to think what if it closes down. It is a business. They do sell old planes and buy new ones. On that part the narrow body planes are much better situation than wide body planes. Example A380 or B777 will have problem to be sold, not so A320.
3. There is a overcapacity in the airlines industry currently (as MAS's new CEO pointed out during a recent interview).
Wonder why you think AirAsia should be worth US$10B someday? Did you do a discounted free cash flow analysis or just compared them to valuations of other budget carriers?
I am the bullish one of course and most analysts provide a higher valuation than its current price. I myself think it should be higher, but of course its my opinion. Analysts tend to take the safe way out as by putting a much higher price, they are taking risk of being considered irrational. I can be irrational. If I think Airasia is worth $2 billion then for it to reach $10 billion is a multiple of 5x. I also do not think dollar will be 4.3x RM in the long run, hence valuation of say RM35billion does not sound too expensive anymore. But of course, many would think I am crazy as Airasia is only priced at RM3.7 billion today. That's 10-20 years down the road. If one is to look at the trajectory of successful and top low costs carrier, Ryanair, Easyjet and Southwest, they have that kind of trajectory over 15 years especially during growth to maturity period.
Today LCC are competitive (even have RayaniAir - hmmm sounds like RyanAir isn't it) but small ones will fizzle out. I am always the proponent of full fledged low costs - not the Singapore model such as Tiger and Scoot where they are owned by SIA. It is hard to have 2 models unless they are independent. I also like the management of Airasia (many will not agree with me) as they are positioned to be successful and grow. Some of the LCCs are positioned to be "jaguh kampung". Airasia is not although they do face huge challenges as we see it when moving overseas. Thailand though is one success story.
I however think SIA's subsidiaries like Tiger will give Airasia a run for their money overtime as SIA is a bigger parent than Airasia has. (Singapore by the country is also more focus, unlike Malaysia whom is trying to kill Airasia and in the process, affecting its own tourism business. I hope overtime they will realise that a strong LCC would bring benefit to the country especially when forex is important to Malaysia)
Also note that as it is Tiger being valued more than SGD1 billion is a sign than a struggling low costs such as Tiger is worth something and not as per what Airasia is valued at today. Check news on SIA's offer for Tiger!
On having a DCF, it is preposterous as DCF model can be out of whack easily. Nobody can predict the cashflow future correctly. These are meant for financial people whom only uses excel well.
On overcapacity, its real and the one who blink first is MAS, right? Them cutting capacity brought some benefits to Airasia and other airlines like Emirates. The data is already been provided by Malaysia Airport whom reports on traffic monthly. The traffic since MAS had its cut brought traffic to KLIA2 significantly. Airasia is by far the biggest user of KLIA2.
In the long run, both LCC and full fledged will see competitions but the next decade will be decade for LCC than the one MAS, Emirates are focusing on. SIA (and I trust the data crunching from Singapore) has already foreseen that. I am seeing also that Airasia is in right position and will be there to ride the wave, But it has to be diligent and careful.
Just look at the trend as seen below.
1 comment:
- tong said...
- one thing great about airasia is the intangible assets it has, the branding and the number of passengers it carry, valuable customer database.
just look at this, the "side business" for an airline company:
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/temptation-grows-for-airlines-to-spin-off-loyalty-programmes-223136/
https://www.aimia.com/en/about/history.html
bottom line is, airasia needs to have healthier balance sheet. (look at AA expedia, Airasia was forced to sell the stake in it earlier than they want due to gearing pressure)
To me i will only re-enter airasia if they manage to bring down their gearing to below 1.5x
(and hopefully positive earnings for both Indonesia & Philippines), which is very workable with aggressive SLB of aircraft, with the help of low fuel cost environment & capacity rationalization from MAS.
