显示标签为“GST”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“GST”的博文。显示所有博文

2014年7月9日星期三

How Will GST Affect Property Developers & Buyers? - Bursa Dvmmy


Author: Tan KW   |   Publish date: Wed, 9 Jul 16:36


Wednesday, 9 July 2014 
This year will still be a good year for property developers. There is no doubt about this.
 
So far I do not feel any slowdown in property market. Developers are still launching their products in great pace and buyers are still "sweeping" properties like buying vegetables.
 
Furthermore, more and more unknown and even listed companies start to join the property business.
 
Is it a sign of prosperity in property sector, or a warning sign of pending property collapse?
 
 
 
Tropicana recently sold RM600mil worth of property in just 6 weeks. This amount matches its whole FY12's  revenue and is almost half of FY13's revenue. Just 6 weeks.
 
Eco World has also launched the first phase of Eco Majestic at Semenyih in May. It offers 612 units of double storey terrace house in which 95% are snapped up. Buyers still queue up for days before the launch.
 
This might be Pre-GST property shopping spree.
 
As we known, GST will be implemented in April next year. How will it affect the property price?
 
 
 
There are generally 3 types of GST:

  • Standard-rated GST
    • GST 6% charged at every stages of supply chain
    • eg. cloth, car, fruits
  • Zero-rated GST
    • No GST charged
    • eg. basic food item
  • Exempt-rated GST
    • GST is not charged to only final consumer
    • eg. residential property, healthcare services
 
A great schematic explanation of GST can be obtained at loanstreet.com.my website.
 
For standard GST, manufacturer & retailer who pay the 6% GST while receiving the goods/service can claim back 100% from the government. So the final consumer is the one who will bear the entire tax burden of GST.
 
 
 
 
In other words, GST does NOT result in extra expenses for most manufacturers and retailers. So their financial result should not be affected.
 
For exempt-rated GST which includes residential property, manufacturer (contractor) can claim back 100% GST paid to construction material suppliers. 
 
However, retailer (developer) cannot pass the GST to consumer (buyer) and cannot claim back from the government. So developers have to bear the entire tax burden of GST.
 
This sounds like developers are loser while house buyers are winner, but it is actually not necessary so.
 
 
 
 
Inevitably developer's cost will increase as it cannot claim back GST paid to contractor from government. In order to maintain the profit margin, developer can increase the selling price of residential property.
 
So basically the profitability of developer is not really affected as the profit margin remain the same, unless developer is forced to sell at lower price because of low demand.
 
As a result, new residential property price will increase, as shown below (extracted from loanstreet.com.my)
 
 
 
In summary, GST will not affect developer very much but new house buyers will need to bear higher house price. Government is a clear winner as it collects more tax compared to current tax system.
 
So consumer is not a winner but a loser.
 
How about new commercial property?
 
Commercial property is in the category of standard-rated GST, which means buyers have to bear the entire tax burden of GST throughout the supply chain. This sounds scary. 
 
If a developer sell a new shop office at RM1 million, should a buyer pay 6% GST of RM60,000 on top of the RM1 million paid to developer?
 
I have modified the residential GST scheme table above for commercial property. Lets assume they have the same cost and profit margin.
 
 
 
Even though the 6% GST is applied to commercial property buyer, the final cost of the property to buyer (RM572,400) is still same as the residential property. 
 
This means that the final price that buyers pay (include tax) for new commercial property will also increase after GST, and it is at the same rate as residential property.
 
The difference is, when selling commercial property, developer can claim back the 6% GST charged to it by contractor from the government. Government will collect more tax because there is an extra 6% tax in the end of supple chain compared to residential property.
 
It sounds like developer will earn more by selling commercial property because it can claim back the GST charged to it. It is not necessary so as the profit will depend on the margin. Actually in the example above, developer earns less in absolute amount by selling commercial property (sales price - final cost after tax claim).
 
After all, the pre-GST property shopping spree is warranted as property price will increase after GST implementation.
 
However, property developer's profit should not be affected directly by GST but it may suffer indirectly should the demand of property drops as a result of increasing property price.

These are what I know and it might not be totally right. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
 

2014年7月6日星期日

GST

消費稅(上篇):消費稅你真的瞭解嗎?

  •     
商家不需要掏錢繳稅
自我監管機制防漏稅
  • 消費稅的落實將有助於打擊漏稅,也可增加政府的稅收,但消費人必須經歷轉型的陣痛。(圖:星洲日報)
消費稅(GST)又稱為增值稅(Value Added Tax),從1983年開始,我國政府便已經派遣研究人員前往韓國取經,經過長達30年後,在2013年確定要實施,取代現有的服務稅(Service Tax)和10%的銷售稅(Sales Tax)。
消費稅將在2015年4月1日全面落實。
消費稅徵稅的範圍分為兩個部份,第一個便是由國內供應的物品和服務;第二個就是所有進口我國的物品,在保留進口稅的同時,以消費稅來取代銷售稅。
非層層疊加
服務和物品的範圍非常廣泛,它包括有形與無形的。宏願機構稅務與財務諮詢總監,同時也是財政部消費稅監督委員會成員的拿督蔡兆源舉例笑道:“情侶間給彼此一個擁抱,那也叫服務;如果你採訪我,那也是服務。”,區別只是在於會不會徵收消費稅。
蔡兆源指出,至今還有許多民眾或部份人民代議士對消費稅的概念還很模糊,有人甚至會認為是從製造商、批發商、零售商,每一層都會抽取6%的消費稅,最後導致稅上加稅,造成消費者必須承擔和面對物價高漲的結果。
向製造商徵收
在現有的稅制下,商家往往會通過制度的漏洞來逃稅或漏稅。
蔡兆源指出,由於銷售稅是向製造商徵收的,因此製造業者在出售某種物品就需要繳付10%的銷售稅,如果這物品的售價是100令吉,就必須要繳10令吉;所以有很多業者也會同時設立一家自己的批發公司,製造貨品後,以90令吉價格賣給批發公司,再由批發公司賣給零售商。
雖然最終售價還是100令吉,但由於批發商和零售商是不需要繳付稅務的,業者就從中省下了10令吉的稅務,也導致政府的稅收減少,這是銷售稅與生俱來的缺陷,無法避免。(見表一)然而,消費稅的實行,卻能防止漏稅的情況發生。
從製造業者生產商品、出售給批發商,再批發給零售商的過程中,無論哪一層,一旦進行交易,都必須繳付消費稅,但這並不等於所有商家繳交的消費稅數額將疊加起來。
蔡兆源舉例:“比如家具廠購買原料時,需繳付6%消費稅,當他們用原料做成了桌子,出售給消費者時,也必須向對方徵收消費稅。”
“這時候,政府允許廠商用已經收取的消費稅,抵消之前繳付的消費稅,剩下的交給政府即可。”以此類推。
這就意味著在供應鏈裡的每一位商家都不需要掏出一分錢繳稅,但由於商家只有在向消費者徵收消費稅後,才能抵消自己曾經繳付的稅,環環相扣的情況下,能確保稅款一分不少地交給政府,能有效地打擊漏稅。
因此蔡兆源將這種機制稱為“自我監管機制”。
民眾只需承擔6%消費稅
當最後零售商將貨物出售給民眾時,民眾只需要承擔6%消費稅,而不是層層稅務疊加後的高昂價格。
蔡兆源不諱言指出,從原本10%銷售稅到6%消費稅,其實對部份商家來說,是減低了生產的成本。
他舉例,現在購買一台價值1千令吉,在本地製造的電視機需要收10%的銷售稅,最後售價是1千100令吉;但在銷售稅實行後,同樣的電視,收了6%的消費稅,售價是1千60令吉,節省40令吉。
徵稅範圍擴大
更多物品漲價
財政部副部長拿督阿末馬斯蘭曾在國會匯報時提到,屆時將有689種貨品將被徵稅,其中有73種價格因此上漲,有287種價格下降,還有329種項目的價格在稅後依然保持不變。
不過,原本銷售稅和服務稅是只限於小部份的物品和餐館,一旦落實消費稅,徵稅範圍幾乎將擴大到無所不在,物價上漲、生活成本提高是必然的結果,我國人民的經濟壓力大增已經是意料之中。
這表示,在實施消費稅後,由於稅務結構的改變,一些物品的價格反而更便宜了。可是,由於徵稅的範圍擴大了,導致原本之前無需繳稅的許多物品或服務都必須徵收消費稅,這也使到更多物品和服務的價格上漲。
國家收入應多元化
我國政府長期以來的主要收入是依賴石油、銷售稅、服務稅、公司稅以及少部份人繳交的所得稅,蔡兆源認為,一個國家的收入應該是多元化的,所以依靠特定幾個項目作為收入來源,是不健康的現象。
石油被稱為“天公錢”,它並非是取之不盡的資源,不知何時就會枯竭,因此在一些北歐國家甚至不會將石油列為國家的收入,只是成立一個特別基金,將它視為國家額外的財富,並不會使用。
而我國即便將它納入國家的收入之一,佔了國家總收入的35%,也入不敷出,情況堪憂。
國家的主要經濟來源是來自稅收,其中之一的所得稅是以個人以及企業的收入為基準,當遭遇金融風暴、市場萎靡時,這部份的收入便會受到影響,這意味著國家的經濟會隨著市場的發展波動。
與此同時,還有部份人士和企業也會將資金存放在其他國家,藉此管道逃稅,某些特定情形下,政府無法追索回稅款,為此造成巨額的稅收損失。
消費稅可改善財政赤字
消費稅的出現,是改善財政赤字的其中一個方式。
消費稅是以消費為導向,無論市場景氣與否,就算是勒緊腰帶,人民的日子還是要過,錢還是要花,就變成國家較為固定、平穩的收入,起著與所得稅相輔相成的作用,形成一個較為健康、安全的制度。
蔡兆源坦承,消費稅會為人民帶來至少一年的陣痛期,額外的通脹率約為1.8%,整體通脹率將高達4.8%。