显示标签为“gab”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“gab”的博文。显示所有博文

2016年3月5日星期六

GAB – Fundamental Analysis (25 Nov 2015)


Latest Financial – Q1 2016 Financial Report (17 Nov 2015) http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/4929593
FY16 Q1 Results Highlight:
  • GAB recorded 1QFY16 revenue of RM405m (+3% yoy) and core earnings of RM63.1m (+15.6% yoy) due to higher sales volume from its core beer brands (better product mix) and improved selling prices. Furthermore, the group benefited from the Government’s measures against contraband beers which has aided the duty paid market.
  • Net profit increased by RM63.1m or 15% yoy due to optimized channel execution and improved cost efficiencies.
Valuation:
  • Absolute EY%:
    • Historical
      • Trailing:
        • FY15 (EPS: 0.709) – 15.454 (Uncertainty Risk: MEDIUM)
        • R4Q (EPS: 0.737) – 16.067 (Uncertainty Risk: MEDIUM)
      • Forward:
        • FY16 (EPS: 0.757 ± 5%) – From 15.671 to 17.321 (Uncertainty Risk: MEDIUM)
        • FY17 (EPS: 0.789 ± 5%) – From 16.344 to 18.064 (Uncertainty Risk: MEDIUM)
      • EPS applied to reach the current stock price (14.38): 0.660
    • Industry
      • Trailing:
        • FY15 (EPS: 0.709) – 13.37 (Uncertainty Risk: VERY HIGH)
        • R4Q (EPS: 0.737) – 13.90 (Uncertainty Risk: HIGH)
      • Forward:
        • FY16 (EPS: 0.757 ± 5%) – From 13.56 to 14.98 (Uncertainty Risk: HIGH to VERY HIGH)
        • FY17 (EPS: 0.789 ± 5%) – From 14.14 to 15.63 (Uncertainty Risk: MEDIUM to HIGH)
  • 5-Y DCF:
    • Good Scenario (12.0% 14.0%): From 17.66 to 18.91 (Uncertainty Risk: LOW to MEDIUM)
    • Base Scenario (9.0% 11.0%): From 15.92 to 17.06 (Uncertainty Risk: MEDIUM)
    • Bad Scenario (6.0% 8.0%): From 14.32 to 15.37 (Uncertainty Risk: MEDIUM to HIGH)
    • Ugly Scenario (2.0% 4.0%): From 12.40 to 13.33 (Uncertainty Risk: VERY HIGH)
    • At current price (14.38), based on RDCF, assumption of FCFF growth rate in the next 5 years is 6.2%.
  • In my opinion, fair value of GAB range from 15 to 16. Uncertainty risk of fair value is MEDIUM.
GAB Football Field
Going Forward:
  • For FY16, it will be challenging for GAB to pass on large price increases to consumers in view of
    • The softer environment
    • Anti-profiteering act which prohibits price increases if it increases profitability excessively.
  • I will continue to hold and accumulate this stock for my kids.
At the time of writing, I owned shares of GAB.

GAB – Fundamental Analysis (25 Jan 2015)


Latest Financial – Q2 2016 Financial Report (19 Jan 2015)
FY16 Q2 Results Highlight:
  • GAB recorded 2QFY16 revenue of RM524.5m (+0.7% yoy) and core earnings of RM90.8m (+19.3% yoy) due to improved cost efficiency, phasing of certain brand advertisement and promotion investments which will take place in the coming months, and higher sales.
  • Profit before tax  increased by 16% from RM174 million to RM202 million
Valuation:
  • In my opinion, fair value of GAB range from 15.3 to 17.7. Uncertainty risk of fair value is MEDIUM.
GAB-FY16-Q2-Fair-Values
Going Forward:
  • For FY16, it will be challenging for GAB to pass on large price increases to consumers in view of
    • The softer environment
    • Anti-profiteering act which prohibits price increases if it increases profitability excessively.
  • I will continue to hold and accumulate this stock for my kids.
At the time of writing, I owned shares of GAB.

2014年12月1日星期一

GAB – Fundamental Analysis (17 Nov 2014)


GAB Analysis:-
Excel – http://1drv.ms/1zuRMAy
My View:-
- Fair values:
  – 5-Y DCF:
    – Good Scenario: 15.70 (Fair value uncertainty: MEDIUM)
    – Base Scenario: 13.69 (Fair value uncertainty: HIGH)
    – Bad Scenario: 11.90 (Fair value uncertainty: VERY HIGH)
    – Ugly Scenario: 10.31 (Fair value uncertainty: EXTREME)
  – Absolute EY% Valuation:
    – Trailing:
      – FY14 (EPS: 0.656) – Fair value 14.02 (Fair Value Uncertainty: MEDIUM)
      – R4Q (EPS: 0.673) – Fair value 14.37 (Fair Value Uncertainty: MEDIUM)
    – Forward:
      – FY15 (EPS: 0.666) – Fair value 14.22 (Fair Value Uncertainty: MEDIUM)
      – FY16 (EPS: 0.697) – Fair value 14.88 (Fair Value Uncertainty: MEDIUM)
    – EPS applied to reach the current stock price (13.2): 0.618
- At the current price, fair value uncertainty for both models are from MEDIUM to HIGH. GAB is still slightly undervalued.
- The dividend return spread between GAB and CARLSBG vs the 10-year MGS yield has narrowed to only 30-40bpts vs the  historical  10-year average of 280-290bpts. (Source: RHB)
- GAB’s focus on FY15 would be on better cost management by enhancing its efficiency and capability, while the product strategy would see better innovation with more quality new addition to its product portfolio. (Aug 2014)
  – In FY15, GAB plans to manage its cost more prudently by improving operational efficiency. Besides, the Group also expects to increase its portfolio by introducing more new products through innovation. New products launched in FY14, including Kirin Ichiban, the best-selling super premium brand in Japan and Smirnoff Ice, the world number 1 RTD brand which received good response, which was reflected in 4Q14 sales growth of 10.8% QoQ. Meanwhile, GAB would still be counting on its core brands, namely Heineken, Tiger and Guinness moving forward in sustaining the sales volume. Although GAB did not reveal the sales figure of the brands, we gathered that Heineken recorded the best sales growth among the core brands, followed by Tiger and Guinness in FY14.
- GAB expects the Malt Liquor Market (MLM) moving forward to remain competitive and challenging, in view of the unfair competition from contraband beers, of which the sales price per unit is lower than the excise duty alone imposed on GAB’s beers as Malaysia has the second highest excise duties for beer and stout products in the world. Meanwhile, the Group is also concerned on the imminent implementation of the GST in April 2015, which may further dent the consumer sentiment and thus discretionary spending.
- 2014/15 will be a challenging year for brewers due to competition from contrabrand beers and as consumer spending dwindles.
- In my opinion, there is still some downside risk even though the share prices of both stocks have fallen sharply from last year’s peaks (down 30-45%). 11.60 – 13.00 is a good support zone, from fundamental and technical aspect. Chances of GAB dropping below this zone is low.
- If GAB manage to achieve growth in FY15, that means GAB have managed the [impact of] GST and played the market share game well. If that happens, GAB will be good to go.
- GAB will not make any profit out of the GST, but they need to get the margins right for the distributors and they need to recommend the distributor price. However, they cannot set pricing in the whole tier system.
Latest Financial – Q1 2015 Financial Report (14 Nov 2014) http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1794305
At the time of writing, my family member owned shares of GAB.

GAB – Fundamental Analysis (8 Nov 2014)

GAB Analysis:-
Excel – http://1drv.ms/1GBcGmf
My View:-
- Fair values:
  – 5-Y DCF:
    – Good Scenario: 15.70 (Fair value uncertainty: MEDIUM)
    – Base Scenario: 13.69 (Fair value uncertainty: HIGH)
    – Bad Scenario: 11.90 (Fair value uncertainty: VERY HIGH)
    – Ugly Scenario: 10.31 (Fair value uncertainty: EXTREME)
  – Absolute EY% Valuation:
    – Trailing:
      – FY14 (EPS: 0.656) – Fair value 14.02 (Fair Value Uncertainty: MEDIUM)
      – R4Q (EPS: 0.656) – Fair value 14.02 (Fair Value Uncertainty: MEDIUM)
    – Forward:
      – FY15 (EPS: 0.666) – Fair value 14.23 (Fair Value Uncertainty: MEDIUM)
      – FY16 (EPS: 0.703) – Fair value 15.02 (Fair Value Uncertainty: MEDIUM)
    – EPS applied to reach the current stock price (13.04): 0.61
- At the current price, fair value uncertainty for both models are from MEDIUM to HIGH.
- The dividend return spread between GAB and CARLSBG vs the 10-year MGS yield has narrowed to only 30-40bpts vs the  historical  10-year average of 280-290bpts. (Source: RHB)
- GAB’s focus on FY15 would be on better cost management by enhancing its efficiency and capability, while the product strategy would see better innovation with more quality new addition to its product portfolio. (Aug 2014)
  – In FY15, GAB plans to manage its cost more prudently by improving operational efficiency. Besides, the Group also expects to increase its portfolio by introducing more new products through innovation. New products launched in FY14, including Kirin Ichiban, the best-selling super premium brand in Japan and Smirnoff Ice, the world number 1 RTD brand which received good response, which was reflected in 4Q14 sales growth of 10.8% QoQ. Meanwhile, GAB would still be counting on its core brands, namely Heineken, Tiger and Guinness moving forward in sustaining the sales volume. Although GAB did not reveal the sales figure of the brands, we gathered that Heineken recorded the best sales growth among the core brands, followed by Tiger and Guinness in FY14.
- GAB expects the Malt Liquor Market (MLM) moving forward to remain competitive and challenging, in view of the unfair competition from contraband beers, of which the sales price per unit is lower than the excise duty alone imposed on GAB’s beers as Malaysia has the second highest excise duties for beer and stout products in the world. Meanwhile, the Group is also concerned on the imminent implementation of the GST in April 2015, which may further dent the consumer sentiment and thus discretionary spending.
- 2014/15 will be a challenging year for brewers due to competition from contrabrand beers and as consumer spending dwindles.
- In my opinion, there is still some downside risk even though the share prices of both stocks have fallen sharply from last year’s peaks (down 30-45%). 11.60 – 13.00 is a good support zone, from fundamental and technical aspect. Chances of GAB dropping below this zone is low.
- If GAB manage to achieve growth in FY15, that means GAB have managed the [impact of] GST and played the market share game well. If that happens, GAB will be good to go.
- GAB will not make any profit out of the GST, but they need to get the margins right for the distributors and they need to recommend the distributor price. However, they cannot set pricing in the whole tier system.
Latest Financial – Annual Report 2014 (06 Nov 2014) http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1786801
At the time of writing, I owned shares of GAB.

2014年8月8日星期五

Business Quality Inspection on GAB (3255)

Author: Intelligent Investor   |   Publish date: Fri, 8 Aug 00:14

Franchise Quality Analysis (FQA)


- GAB able to score 40/40 on the FQA inspection.
-  The 10 YR CAGR of Net Profit is higher than the Revenue, and this show that GAB able to control it's cost efficiently from time to time.

Return on Equity (ROE)

 
 - GAB ROE is way above the WACC (59.53% vs 7.20%)
 - The ROE have been grew in 180.54% with a CAGR of  7.24% on pass 10 year.
 - The ROE was achieved with a moderate profit margin of 12.98%, high sales turn over and high equity multiplier. It show that it make full use of three components in order to achieve the high ROE
 - The financial leverage is a double edge sword it can hurt ROE badly in the bad times. And, high leverage can make a company’s balance sheet unhealthy and become risky during economy downturn.

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

 
GAB's Invested Capital grew by a CAGR of 6.52% while the NOPAT growth at a much higher rate at CAGR of 9.54%.

Owing to this the ROIC was improved from 32.97% to 42.41%, and it is far above the WACC of 7.2%.

Profit Margin & Quality



The revenue grew by 89.16%  (CAGR of 7.34%) but the COGS grew at a higher rate and this result a negative Gross Profit growth rate (CAGR of -1.98%). Even though the Gross Profit Margin was experiencing a negative growth rate but the actual gross profit margin was maintained on above 30%.

Compare to the revenue, Operating profit and Net Profit grew at a lower rate of  21.28% and 16.89% respectively. This number show us that the company's expenses is increase in a faster rate than the revenue.

The OCF is greater than the Net Profit in most of the time and this show a good earning quality.

Cash Flow



OCF is below NP in 4 out of 10 years, and this show that the net income was able to convert to the cash in most of the time.

The revenue was growing from  886M to 1.676B and it is equivalent to a CAGR of 7.34% while the NP was growing from 98M to 217M (CAGR of 9.22%). The growth was achieved with an average CAPEX of 28.1M (CAGR of 3.64%). This shows that the return of CAPEX investment is encouraging.

The OCF and FCF on latest FY is equivalent to 13.46% and 8.36% of revenue; 30.53% and 27.22% of the total asset. The average OCF/Revenue, FCF/Revenue and OCF/Total Asset, FCF/Total Asset is 12.28%, 9.88% and 24.49%, 19.78% respectively. This is way above of my require benchmark of 10%, 5% and 8%, 5% and it shows that the growth quality and earning quality is good.

Insider Pay

The director is drawing 0.16% of remuneration from the revenue and the ratio has been reducing from 0.33%. Based on the business quality as presented above, I think the director is not taking a fat salary.

Leverage & Liquidity




The debt is 29.78% from the total asset, and the cash is 31.49% of the total liabilities.
The current ratio and quick ratio is above the required benchmark of 2 and 1 respectively.
In view of the strong cash flow of GAB, it shouldn't have any issue to pay off it's debt.