2016年3月30日星期三

Thong Guan (7) - A Tsunami Of Profit

Author: Icon8888   |   Publish date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016, 10:21 PM 




(Icon8888 is all smile today)


1. Excellent Results

Thong Guan released its December 2015 quarterly result today with EPS of 9.8 sen per quarter (after factoring in full conversion of ICULS).



The EPS of 9.8 sen is very closed to my forecast of 9.4 sen. Please refer to this article.
http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/icon8888/88890.jsp



2. Balance Sheets Continue to Improve

In March 2015 quarter, net cash was RM0.2 mil. It has now increased to RM52.3 mil. Based on 158 mil shares, net cash per share is 33 sen.





3. Interesting Insights From Cash Flow Statement

So far, I have written 6 articles about Thong Guan. But I have never discussed its cashflow in detail.

Dear readers, there is one piece of very interesting information embedded in the cashflow statement below. Do you manage to spot it ? I give you 2 minutes.



Ok, time's up. 

The interesting information is that from 2014 until 2015, the group has only spent RM55 mil on capex.

What is the implication ?

Thong Guan has stated numerous time that during the period from 2014 until 2016, the group will be spending RM100 mil on capex. As such, the RM55 mil capex so far is only half way through.

If you still don't get it - the recent earning explosion is caused by half of the capex only. What will happen after the entire RM100 mil was fully spent ? It is time to stretch your imagination !!!

Previously, if you tell people that Thong Guan can make RM60 mil per annum, people will say you are crazy. This is because in the past 10 years, Thong Guan's profit hovered around RM20 mil to RM30 mil.

But with this latest quarter's net profit of RM15.5 mil, most people will readily accept that RM60 mil can be the norm (let's just say that strong USD will be here for the next few years - which is my view).

But now with this latest insight gained from analysing the cashflow statement, I would like to be the first one to plant the flag - should we revise upwards our expectation and aim for earnings of at least RM70 mil ? (EPS of 44 sen based on 158 mil shares) 

The possibility is there. However, as usual, only time can tell. 

My optimisim does not exist in vacuum - the following article dated 26 June 2015 contains details of 2016 capex.




As stated in the article above, the group will be spending RM35 mil on capex in 2016 to produce nano layered strecth flm and stretch hood. These two new products will be KEY CONTRIBUTORS TO GROUP REVENUE IN TWO YEARS.

Sounds like big impact projects !!!

Just in case you wonder what is strecth hood, this is how it looked like.







4. Noodle Division Will Be The New Star Performer

If you think that whatever I wrote above is already sizzling hot, just wait until you read about its noodle division. In the latest quarterly report, the company has some positive things to say about this division :-



If you are scratching your head wondering what is happening in the noodle division, you must have missed out this latest article dated 11 February 2016 :-


KUALA LUMPUR: Kedah-based packaging group Thong Guan Industries Bhd plans to work with its Chinese partner, the COFCO group, to tap the organic noodles market in China, and eventually spin off its food and beverage (F&B) and other consumable product business, which is deemed to have a better margin, profit and valuation than its core packaging business, in three years.
The group, which is expecting double-digit growth in both its top and bottom lines for the financial year ending Dec 31, 2016 (FY16), underpinned by continued expansion, is also on the hunt for merger and acquisition opportunities to grow its packaging segment.
In the planned organic noodles venture, Thong Guan executive director Ang See Meng, son of group managing director Datuk Ang Poon Chuan, told The Edge Financial Daily recently that COFCO, which stands for China National Cereals, Oils and Foodstuffs Corp, had shown its interest in jointly participating in the business.
One of China’s state-owned food processing holding companies, COFCO is also China’s largest food processing, manufacturer and trading group.
“We have not decided on the joint-venture details. It could be equity participation in Everprosper Food Industries Sdn Bhd, a new subsidiary of ours, which includes all related subsidiaries, or another new company we will form. It depends on the project size [of the organic instant noodles venture],” See Meng said.
According to See Meng, not many companies make organic noodles now and the margin is higher compared with conventional noodles. COFCO, he said, has expressed its interest in taking up at least a 40% stake in the venture, which he expects to take off sometime this year.
“Our discussions with COFCO are still ongoing. They see [the] potential in organic noodles for babies and organic instant noodles, and would like the noodles to be sold online. They also said Chinese consumers prefer imported food. We have visited them in Beijing twice so far. They are planning a visit after the Chinese New Year,” See Meng said.
The new venture will need certification papers from the Chinese government before it can mass-produce organic noodles for the Chinese market. “They (COFCO) have agreed to supply us organic flour in order for us to get the organic certification from China,” See Meng shared.
See Meng believes Thong Guan has the capability to export organic noodles worldwide and be the first to export organic noodles for consumption by Chinese babies, which are deemed a billion-dollar business.
The group’s noodles are now exported to 10 countries. China makes up about 10% of its total noodle sales — relatively small as the group only started supplying its noodles to COFCO two months ago. With the new organic noodle venture, Thong Guan expects the Chinese market to contribute at least 70% of its total noodle sales in two years.
“I believe there will be more orders, especially when we start providing organic noodles,” See Meng said, adding that besides COFCO, Thong Guan also gets orders from other Chinese companies. The group is now looking at setting up a branch and warehouse in Shuzhou to cater to growing demand.
With the planned venture and capacity expansion, Thong Guan expects revenue contribution from its F&B and other consumable product segment to grow to 30% in two to three years. The F&B and other consumable product segment makes up about 10% to 15% of group revenue now, but contributes about 30% of its profit. Its core plastic packaging segment, meanwhile, contributes about 85% of the group’s revenue, but 70% of its profit. Clearly, the margin is higher in the non-core segment.
“Our packaging division is stable and we are one of the largest in Asia. We want to realise more value from our F&B and other consumable product segment, so that it can stand alone and generate more value for shareholders,” See Meng said.
Thus, the group will eventually spin off its F&B and other consumable product segment as the market has not priced in the value of the segment of the group, hidden as it is below the plastic packaging segment.
We definitely plan to list it as [a] separate entity in two to three years. It won’t necessarily be in Malaysia, as we hope to hedge the risk [of being only in one market]. For an industrial packaging company, the fair valuation is only between eight and 10 times P/E (price/earnings). But for F&B and other consumables, the market will give us more than 10 times P/E,” he added.
As for the M&A hunt for its packaging business, Thong Guan is now talking with two packaging firms, one each in Malaysia and Vietnam.
“The prices are still high now, so we are waiting for a more suitable time. We are talking, but it may take a while,” said See Meng, without giving a specific time frame for when the talks will come to an end.
Meanwhile, this year will mark the group’s last phase of its three-year RM100 million capital expenditure plan that began in 2014. The group spent RM60 million in the last two years. The remaining RM30 million will be used this year to expand its noodle business, fund a new polyvinyl chloride line and initiate its five-layer blown film stretch hood line.
“With the machinery we put in over the past two years, we are looking at double-digit growth for FY16,” said See Meng, adding that 2016 will be a better year for the group.
Thong Guan’s net profit grew 2.6 times to RM11.26 million in the third quarter ended Sept 30, 2015, from RM4.92 million a year ago. For the cumulative nine-month period (9MFY15), the group’s net profit rose 6.16% to RM22.99 million from RM21.65 million in 9MFY14. The improvement was mainly due to higher margins from exports.
Its shares closed down six sen or 2% at RM2.94 yesterday, valuing it at RM309.5 million.

===============

For your information, COFCO is no kicimeow company. It is a State Owned Enterprise and is the largest food trading and distribution company in China. It handles a wide variety of agricultural produce including edible oil, wheat, rice, sugar, tea, milk, etc. 

Appendix - Thong Guan's Organic Noodles Partner - COFCO


Sell Your Car, Sell Your House. Time To Sai Lang

Author: Icon8888   |   Publish date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016, 09:39 AM 





1. Introduction

Recently, Air Asia released a strong set of results for the December 2015 quarter. Many investors jumped in to take position. How good was the result actually ? Did the December 2015 quarter contain any one off gain ? Can the good performance be repeated ? Is Air Asia still a good buy at current price ?


2. P&L Analysis

To answer the above questions, I put Air Asia's past few quarters' results in a spreadsheet and did a quick analysis.

Plenty of pleasant surprises.



Key observations :-

(a) Fuel Cost

According to quarterly reports, Air Asia used 6.28 mil barrels of oil in FY2015 and average fuel cost was USD81 per barrel (being average of 88, 85, 77, 75).

To test whether my understanding is correct, I did a back of envelope calculation.

2015 estimated fuel cost = 6.28 mil barrels x USD81 x 3.90 = RM1,984 mil.

According to quarterly reports, total fuel consumption was RM2,001 mil. It seemed that the formula works.

I understand that the group has hedged some of its FY2016 fuel requirement at USD59. Lets use that to run a simulation.

By applying the same formula, estimated fuel cost for FY2016 = 6.28 mil barrels x USD59 x 4.10 = RM1,519 mil.

Fuel Saving = RM2,001 mil - RM1,519 mil = RM482 mil

Based on 2,783 mil shares, fuel saving alone is 17.3 sen per share !!!

Now you know why I ask you to sell car sell house.

(b) Revenue

This item is very important. One of the main reasons Air Asia reported such strong December results was because its revenue jumped Q-o-Q from RM1.52 billion to RM2.17 billion. We need to examine the figures to find out whether it can be repeated going forward.

As shown in table above, there were two main things that caused December revenue to spike. The first one was aircraft operating lease of RM728 mil, an increase of RM484 mil compared to previous quarter's RM244 mil. The company explained that it was revenue previously not recognised due to uncertainty of recoverability. If that is the case, it will be a one off item. 

The second reason was higher passenger seat sales of RM1,133 mil compared to previous quarter's RM987 mil, an increase of 15%. In my opinion, this item is indication of genuine improvement in operational performance.

(c) Operating Expenses

Apart from fuel cost, other expenses such as staff cost, maintenance, etc remain stable and in line with historical performance.

(d) Associates

This item is also very important. In September and December 2015 quarter, associate losses was RM625 mil and RM225 mil respectively. We need to understand how those losses arise and whether they will occur again in the future.

For comparison purpose, the table below shows both Malaysia operation as well as those of associates :-

 

As shown above, 45% owned Thai Air Asia is quite sizeable. Its revenue was almost half of Malaysia operation. It is also profitable, with PBT of RM68 mil in latest quarter.

Indonesia Air Asia is 49% owned. Its revenue was about 1/4 of Malaysia operation. This associate incurred forex loss of RM324 mil in December 2015 quarter, and was the main reason behind Air Asia's massive associate losses of RM225 mil.

Philippines, India and Japan's operation is quite small.

I am relieved to find out that the huge associate losses seen in December 2015 quarter was due to Indonesia Air Asia's forex loss (and hence one off). This means that operationally, even though the associates are loss making, they are not bleeding the group in a big way. 

In (a) above, I showed how the group will benefit from low fuel cost. The same should happen to all these associate companies as well. As such, in coming quarters, it is not inconceivable that associates contribution will turn positive. 


3. Projection and Valuation

As usual, to determine whether Air Asia is overvalued at current price, I rely on PE multiple.

Based on 2,783 mil shares and RM1.66, Air Asia's existing market cap is RM4.6 billion. Based on 10 times PE multiple (plucked from the air), I will only feel comfortable if Air Asia can generate at least RM460 mil net profit per annum. 

Is Air Asia in a position to deliver ? I constructed a simple financial model to try to gain further insight :-


To be objective, I chose not to manipulate any figures and instead let them flow naturally. Without any interference from me, the financial model churns out potential net profit of RM1.1 billion, or EPS of 40 sen for FY2016. 

The figure looked staggering. Is it far fetched ? Is Icon8888 the only one that came up with such bullish projection ? 

Not really, the following are recent analysts' forecast for Air Asia. Their figures are not as high as mine (probably due to more conservative assumptions regarding fuel cost). However, the projections are still way above market expectation (as reflected by latest market price) :-


(Maybank IB analyst report dated 29 February 2016, expects RM796 mil net profit this year. EPS of 28.6 sen)


(Hong Leong IB analyst report dated 29 February 2016, expects RM822 mil net profit this year, RM1.06 billion net profit next year)


(Kenanga IB analyst report dated 29 February 2016, expects RM810 mil net profit this year)


(Public IB is the most conservative. However, it is still as high as RM683 mil, or EPS of 27.6 sen)


4. Concluding Remarks

I believe the market has not fully understood the implication of Air Asia's latest turn around. Having said so, I would like to point out that RM1.1 billion net profit is aggressive and is NOT what I am targeting for in FY2016. Same as every other stock, I am only targeting 30% return for Air Asia by end 2016 (Target Price roughly RM2.20). Anything above that is bonus. 

In view of the favorable balance of reward vs risk, I hereby stick my neck out to scream for Buy. Air Asia's tagline is "Now Everyone Can Fly". Mine is "Now Everyone Can Buy". 

However, I am just joking when I said sell car sell house. Please buy within your means. 

Last but not least, it is pointless to blame others when your investment is down. That won't help you to become a successful investor. My article should be treated as a source of information to help you to understand a stock, not a fixed deposit slip that guarantees your return.

Your money your risk your reward. Have fun.

(Icon) Air Asia (2) - Understand Its Past To Better Feel Its Future

Author: Icon8888   |   Publish date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016, 12:04 PM 


(Buffett was averse to airline stocks due to their low profit margin and heavy capex requirement. Will he change his mind now that oil is so cheap ?)


Executive Summary
(a) In the past few years, Air Asia has grown its fleet and revenue substantially, yet its profitability remained more or less the same. To find out why, I undertook a detailed study of the group's historical P&L.
(b) Pursuant to my analysis, high fuel cost (and the inability to pass through to passengers) is the main culprit.
(c) Current low oil price will unshackle the group, allowing it to keep price low and at the same time rake in healthy profit margin.  
(d) As a conclusion, Air Asia is entering a golden era, with strong profit and potentially high dividend going forward. Maintained "Screaming Buy".    


1. Introduction

Last week, after I published Part 1, many readers gave their comments. One in particular caught my attention - "Warren Buffett doesn't like airline stocks". 

Without the need to cross check, I immediately know that the comment is very likely true.  

This is because everybody knows that Warren Buffett likes strong free cashflow. You don't need to be an aviation expert to know that airline business is characterised by low margin and high capex. Some people describe it as "growing themselves into bankruptcy". This is the exact opposite of what Warren Buffett desires.

Is this stereotype applicable to Air Asia ? How has it performed in the past ? What actually dragged down its performance ? Are these inhibitors stil there ? Will they continue to affect the group going forward ? 


2Unpleasant Big Picture Indeed

The only way to answer those questions is to study the group's past performance.

First of all, we need to establish whether Air Asia meets Buffett's stereotype for airline companies.



Indeed, the group displayed certain characteristics of Buffett stereotype for airline companies :-

(a) Between FY2009 and FY2015 (a period of 7 years), Air Asia spent a total of RM10.7 billion on capital expenditure.

(b) The group increased its fleet size by 67% from 48 aircrafts to 80 aircrafts.

(c) In line with the fleet expansion, revenue also increased by 73% from RM3.13 billion to RM5.42 billion (I used FY2014 figure as 2015 was inflated by huge aircraft operating lease, as pointed out in my first article). 

(d) Unfortunately, PBT (exlcudes exceptional items) remained stagnant throughtout the years.

(e) Net borrowings increased from RM6.85 billion to RM10.2 billion.

What had transpired ? What are the things that held back the group 

To answer the above question, we need to take a closer look at the group's historical P&L. 



The table above contains a lot of information. Unfortunately, it is a format that is not conducive for spotting patterns and trends.

It turns out that by looking at year-on-year changes, the various major factors affecting Air Asia's profitability will immediately show up. 



Just in case the readers do not understand how to read the above table, let me use revenue to demonstrate. For example, the FY2010 figure of RM815 mil = FY2010 revenue - FY2009 revenue = RM3,948 mil - RM3,133 mil. 

Key observations :-

(a) Between FY2009 and 2015, average revenue growth was RM492 mil per annum. 

(b) Despite heavy capex, depreciation charges had not grown by much. On average, the increase was around RM70 mil per annum. Not a small number, but relatively insignificant compared to average revenue growth of RM492 mil per annum. It is not the major culprit we are looking for.

(c) The same is true for interest expenses. The group's borrowings increased by 66% from RM7.6 billion in FY2009 to RM12.6 billion in FY2015. However, net interest expenses on average increased by RM33 mil per annum only. Again, it was relatively insignificant compared to annual revenue growth of RM492 mil per annum. 

(Note : Further analysis showed that the relatively small increase in interest expenses was largely due to the group's ability to lower its cost of financing from 4.9% to 4.2% over the years)

(d) The item that has the biggest negative impact on group profitability turned out to be fuel expenses. As shown in table above, during the period from FY2010 until FY2013, average increase in fuel expenses was RM321 mil per annum. This item alone knocked off 65% of the increase in revenue from capacity expansion, leaving behind only 35% to cater for increase in other expenses. After deducting all the additional expenses, there is nothing much left for shareholders.


4. The Economics Of Fuel Surcharge

In my opinion, the high fuel cost experienced by Air Asia was actually a result of competitive pressure.

The group is entitled to pass on higher fuel cost to passengers. However, due to intense competition from MAS and other low cost operators, the group absorbed the bulk of the cost increase to defend market share. During the period under review, average fare per passenger was on downward trend despite persistently high oil price.     



The effects of high fuel price was particularly pronounced during the period from 2011 to 2013. Even after passing on some of the cost to passengers by way of fuel surchage, average cost per barrel was still as high as USD111 per barrel.

That was the main reason why Air Asia was not able to grow its profit despite healthy top line growth.

However, there are signs that things are improving. In the latest quarter ended 31 December 2015, average fare has increased to RM178 per passenger. 



The improvement was likely due to MAS' rationalisation exercise which involved shutting down certain flight routes. The company made the following commentary in the December 2015 quarterly report :- 

 




5. Cashflow

There are allegations that airline companies need to call on shareholders to inject capital every now and then. Is that the case for Air Asia ? Let's look at the group's historical cash flow to help us answer the question. 



Key observations :-

(a) Good time or bad time, the group generated robust EBITDA of approximately RM1.5 billion per annum. I give that a big LIKE.

(b) The group spent heavily on capex (RM10.7 billion over a period of 7 years) to grow market share.
I reject the notion that the group is growing itself into bankruptcy. 
As per my analysis above, profit stagnation was mostly due to high fuel cost and competitive pressure tying their hands. Now that we are entering an era of low oil price, many of the routes that previously struggled to break even should turn profitable.
On hind sight, the group has done the right thing by pushing ahead with capacity expansion in the face of high fuel cost. Without that, it won't be able to enjoy the current windfall gain brought by low oil price.
Opportunity is indeed for the prepared mind.   

(c) During the period from FY2011 to 2015, the group injected RM743 mil capital into its associate companies and jointly controlled entities (Thai Air asia, Indonesia Air Asia, Philippine Air Asia, etc) by way of equity injection as well as shareholders' advances.
Apart from Thai Air Asia, the other associate companies had not performed well. However, with the current low oil price, the odds of them turning around had improved substantially. In coming quarters, we will find out whether that will indeed be the case. 

(d) In FY2009, the group undertook a placement exercise involving issuance of 380 mil new shares at RM1.33 per share to raise RM500 mil. Apart from that, there is no other equity fund raising exercise. Seemed like "rights issue every now and then" is nothing more than wild talks.

(e) Not only that, Air Asia has been consistently paying out dividend since FY2011.  



With prevailing low oil price and expected spike in earnings, shareholders will be looking forward to generous payout going forward. Why not ? Tony loves cash too.

Cheers.



Air Asia (3) - How Much Will It Benefit From Ringgit Appreciation ?

Author: Icon8888   |   Publish date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016, 11:58 AM

According to Alliance DBS Research, more than 75% of Air Asia X's expenses are denominated in USD.




As Air Asia has same business model as AAX, I wonder whether it has a similar cost structure ? To find out how the strengthening of Ringgit will affect Air Asia, let's take a closer look at its historical P&Ls.

If I am not wrong, the yellow highlighted items should be mostly denominated in USD. 

For revenue, the final quarter of aircraft operating lease was unusually high. I normalised the figure by annualising January to September 2015 figures to arrive at USD248 mil as full year estimate.

For expenses, the FY2015 fuel figure was based on USD82 per barrel. In FY2016, the likely price per barrel should be USD59 (Air Asia has hedged 50% of its requirement at that price). Based on 6.28 million barrels, fuel expense should be USD371 mil.


Based on the adjusted fuel cost, total expense would be approximately USD1.25 billion, out of which USD631 mil will be denominated in USD. This represents approximately 50% of total expenses.

However, after being offset against USD248 mil operating lease revenue, net Dollar denominated expenses is only USD383 mil, representing 30% of expenses.

To determine the impact of USD movement, I did a quick sensitivity analysis based on base case of 4.1 and USD383 mil :-


According to table above, every RM0.10 movement in RM vs USD will result in RM38 mil changes. Based on 2.783 billion shares, approximately 1.4 sen impact on EPS.

亞航6傳私有化‧分析員:狼來了


Author: Tan KW   |   Publish date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016, 01:19 PM 

2016-03-29 08:47
  •  
(吉隆坡28日訊)亞洲航空(AIRASIA,5099,主板貿服組)再傳私有化消息,但分析員不再隨風起舞,認為只是“狼來了”,更強調私有化亞航不如市場想像般簡單,可謂困難重重。

上週,市場傳出亞航大股東丹斯里東尼費南德斯和拿督卡瑪魯丁,計劃與中國光大銀行攜手私有化亞航。受消息刺激,亞航股價今日一度起11仙至1令吉91仙。

雖然分析員潑冷水,但亞航股價最終仍以1令吉89仙收市,漲8仙,成交量報5千799萬1千股,是全場第3熱門股。

馬銀行研究直言,自亞航2004年上市至今,市場至少已傳出5次私有化謠言,加上今次則多達6次,但亞航本身卻始終不曾收到任何私有化獻議,顯示私有化或許不如市場想像般簡單。

“就現實考量,亞航今次也不太可能私有化;因為,東尼和卡瑪魯丁過去12個月來並不曾增購亞航股票,即使傳言中的合作夥伴中國光大銀行暗地里購股,持股卻也肯定不到5%,所以才無須對交易所匯報。”

馬銀行直言,自上月杪公佈第四季業績以來,亞航股價至今已大漲超過30%,股價如今已高於1令吉80仙目標價,因此決定調低該公司投資評級至“守住”。

馬銀行還建議投資者,假如亞航股價因私有化傳言而走高,投資者該趁機套利。

達證券亦不看好亞航私有化謠言,因從虎航和馬航(MAS)私有化來看,股東不太可能願意接受任何低於每股有形資產值(NTA)2倍以下的獻售價,相當於3令吉18仙。

“更何況,東尼及卡瑪魯丁目前不過合計擁有亞航的18.9%股權,距離75%全購門檻非常遙遠,要通過少數股東這關並不容易。”

不管怎樣,達證券維持亞航“買進”評級不變,目標價2令吉39仙,相當於2016年的9倍預估本益比。(星洲日報/財經)

CPO BREAKS NEW RECORD FOR YEAR 2016! NOW AT RM2,781 PER TON. Grab All Oil Palm Counters Quickly!


Author: calvintaneng   |   Publish date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016, 08:54 PM 

Settlement Price: RM 2535Settlement Price: RM 2490Settlement Price: RM 2501Settlement Price: RM 2507Settlement Price: RM 2537Settlement Price: RM 2528Settlement Price: RM 2557Settlement Price: RM 2546Settlement Price: RM 2608Settlement Price: RM 2593Settlement Price: RM 2610Settlement Price: RM 2611Settlement Price: RM 2654Settlement Price: RM 2679Settlement Price: RM 2685Settlement Price: RM 2712Settlement Price: RM 2700Settlement Price: RM 2674Settlement Price: RM 2723Settlement Price: RM 2762

EL NINO IS POWERING UP CPO PRICES - LIFTING UP ALL OIL PALM COUNTERS!

 
Change page: < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... >  |  Displaying page 1 of 160, items 1 to 10 of 1597.
 PRICING DATESETTLEMENT PRICE (RM) 
 Mon, 28 Mar 20162762 
 Fri, 25 Mar 20162723 
 Thu, 24 Mar 20162674 
 Wed, 23 Mar 20162700 
 Tue, 22 Mar 20162712 
 Mon, 21 Mar 20162685 
 Fri, 18 Mar 20162679 
 Thu, 17 Mar 20162654 
 Wed, 16 Mar 20162611 
 Tue, 15 Mar 20162610 

Hi Guys,
Closing price for 29th March, 2016 is Rm2,781 Per Tonne.
At this rate All Palm Oil Counters will Power Up.
Calvin called for a buy on Jaks at 39 cents due to Langat 2
 
calvintaneng Whoa!

Top boss bought at 44 cents and above, millions of them. Anything below 40 cents is a bargain!

So don't wait or else Jaks jump Jump JUMP Up And Away!
16/12/2014 15:00
 
Jaks jumped to Rm1.20 (Up Rm200%)
 
On December 24th 2014 Calvin called for a Buy on Pohuat (Power Huat) around Rm1.25 Pohuat (Power Huat) Will Power Up Due To FALLEN RINGGIT!
 Posted by calvintaneng > Dec 26, 2014 11:16 PM Report Abuse X
WOW! Poh Huat

POWER HUAT

P/E only 3

What A Powerful Growth Stock

With Profits from Viet Dong now stronger than ringgit. Currency conversion gain will amplify and

Propel Powerful Huat Futher!

LOAD UP ON POWERFUL HUAT NOW

POHUAT (Power Huat) Skyrocketed to Rm3.80 and Split
UP A WHOPPING 200%
JAKS WAS POWERED UP BY LANGAT 2 PROJECTS!
POHUAT WAS POWERED UP BY FALLEN RINGGIT!


So Who Will Listen To Calvin This Round?

KeyAsic--下一只“全球最牛科技股”!


Author: alisan   |   Publish date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016, 08:21 PM 

如果你还没非常用心,仔细地研究过KeyAsic这家公司,建议你赶快。否则,即使你今天读了这篇文章,你和马股的下一只“最牛科技股”,可能也是有缘无份呗。
连亏6年,直到去年也还在亏,对于这样一家公司,正常的投资者估计都不太可能会产生兴趣,也绝对不会认为这家公司被低估。因为,多数投资者在判断一家公司是否被低估时,不外是把单季EPSx4,然后拿来算本益比,多过10倍就不算低估,少过10倍才可能低估。
用这种标准计算,KeyAsic不但未被低估,甚至还被高估了呢。
所以,请先抛开正常投资观念,听我说故事呗。
在马股,不,是在马来西亚,我们今天所谓的科技公司,做的十之八九是代工生意,意思就是人家先进国家发明了产品,自己生产却嫌贵嫌麻烦,所以把一些简单或可以外包的部分交给我们代产,这盘生意倒也不错赚,量也大,马股中现在的所谓大型科技股(你知道他们是谁),做的就是这样的生意。
这有什么问题,你会问。
问题就在长久下去,我们的科技业永远只能当别人的奴隶,没有属于自己的成品和竞争力,只是一颗齿轮而不是一台机械。你想想,如果Apple明天垮台了,马股中有多少家科技公司会跟着垮台?
这就是KeyAsic与众不同的地方了。
KeyAsic是家研发和制造晶片的公司;在马来西亚,它不是唯一一家生产晶片的公司,不同在于,其他晶片制造商只是根据客户(晶片版权拥有人)要求产货,KeyAsic却是唯一一家研发出本身品牌晶片的公司,自己掌握晶片版权。
但是,为了要与众不同,KeyAsic也受了不少苦。为了研发晶片,它在过去6年花了上亿令吉,几乎用尽公司所有资源,才终于在去年成功发明出一张足以扭转公司命运的晶片--Kcard。
这Kcard,其实就是用于储存和转移数据的SD Card。可是,Kcard却具备全世界任何SD Card都没有的新功能,就是拥有Wi-FI,意思就是,转移SD Card数据无需再Plug in Plug out或Cable,用Wi-Fi就行了。
看到这里,很多人的反应或许会与我初次了解Kcard功能一样,认为没甚么大不了,但是,我们都错了。
因为,Kcard所多出的WiFi功能,其实已经让KeyAsic走在物联网(IOT)市场的前端。在马来西亚,我敢说这样的公司暂时没有第二家。
去年,KeyAsic推出Kcard时,解释是Kcard主要会被作相机的SD Card,当时我的想法是相机市场销量已明显下跌,Kcard难有作为。可上星期看了新闻报导,才发现Kcard用途根本远超想象,更已推出新版本,就是用于医疗市场的Mcard,而当中最令我惊喜的,自然是Mcard多出的双向连接功能(Two Way Communication)。
双向连接功能,是让两个身处两地的人,透过云端互相交换甚至操控数据;比方说,当某种医疗器材插上Mcard后,在家疗养的病人就能把该器材的诊断和治疗数据上传云端给医生过目,医生评估数据后,也能配合病情变化隔空对该医疗器材做出相应调整。
这绝对是突破性的发展,而且当然不会只应用在医疗市场,无论是任何领域,任何工厂的机械或电子设备,都有可能被远程操控和调整。工程师无需到工厂也能发现并解决机械问题,技师身在工厂却能检测你家电器的问题,再判断是否该送厂维修。
这就是物联网,也是未来。
你可以想象,在KeyAsic已经替Kcard争取到16种15年以上专利,包括欧美日等大国赋予的多种专利的情况下,这家公司的潜能究竟有多大。
过去6年,KeyAsic都在亏钱。但是,由于Kcard和Mcard的贡献才刚要显现,加上公司固定成本不高,KeyAsic几乎肯定会在今年转亏为盈,问题只在赚多少。
总的来看,Keyasic已渡过风险最高的研发阶段,也在产品的初步销售阶段取得不错的开端,只要这股士气延续下去,那距离一般长达数年的收成或爆发阶段应该已经不远。
何况KeyAsic背后还有人脉鼎盛的国库控股Khazanah这个大靠山,产品够好永远不愁没销路。而且,你也该想想,一直都对投资新兴科技公司非常谨慎和严格的国库控股,为什么敢把钱砸在KeyAsic身上,过去几年任它亏。
去年,有一家软件公司因为GST正式落实,而被投资银行吹捧上天,一年里涨了15倍,红遍全马,最后红到中国大陆去,被中国媒体封为“全球最牛科技股”。可是,GST一过,这家公司业绩立刻下跌,股价也惨不忍睹,只剩巅峰时的40%。
横看竖看,马股目前最有希望成为下一家最牛科技股的,非初显研发成果的KeyAsic莫属,如果Kcard和Mcard真的卖出火来,KeyAsic的爆发力度和潜能,肯定远超以区区GST作题的前浪,而且不会轻易收科。
所以目前最关键的始终是Kcard和Mcard的销售表现。如果产品销量不如预期,那在目前股价,KeyAsic并不便宜甚至很昂贵。可是,如果销量符合甚至高于预期,现在的股价却是非常便宜,因为Keyasic将有可能成为大型科技股。
以上分析纯粹是我个人的看法,写这篇文章时,Keyasic的股价是22仙,任何买卖盈亏自负。
好了,这次就先说到这里,下次再聊呗。
28/3/2016

见好就该收 - 黄金十年


Author: Tan KW   |   Publish date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016, 01:37 PM 



2016-03-28 13:03

 
我在接手组合投资三个月的时间,发现今时今日的投资形态,和我们在5年前刚开始时有很明显的不同。
那时,我们如果紧抓价值投资的要诀,只会一招半式,也可以在股市里找到吃。
可是,过了5年,投资领域出现了更多不确定的因素。其中一个是投资越来越倾向网上交易。
因为网上交易可以略去了股票经纪这个中介,费用可以减到更低。
在以前,如果打电话叫经纪下单,佣金是0.6至0.7%,最低40令吉。当网上交易推介时,佣金可低至0.42%,最低收费28令吉。
随后股票行开始竞争起来,就有最低收费12令吉,甚至8令吉的优待。
为了鼓励股民增加交易,又有“即日鲜”的手法,即当天完成买和卖,收费可以便宜到0.15%。
到了近日,一些股票行为了招徕顾客,对那些愿意预付现金的顾客,提供低至0.1-0.15%的交易费用,甚至比“即日鲜”的费用还低。
因此,低廉交易费制造了一批新的交易客户,他们现金充裕,不过投机不是他们的主流。
如果他们看到一些好的投资,或者有些股票突然遭到卖压,他们可以用很便宜的费用买入一些,当股价稳定时才卖出。
举例来说,最近比较动荡的大马邮政(POS),他们可以在2.70令吉买入,然后2.80令吉卖出,如果以1万股来算,0.1%再加上其他成本才约60令吉,来回可以赚几百令吉。
就算股价不起,因为他们觉得大马邮政物有所值,长期持有它也不错,所以不怕被套。
这样一来,短线交易量增加,股票的涨势就会受到压抑。
不过,价值投资者一般上注重价值,而非价钱。只是,我们这些凡夫俗子,当自己买的股票被人炒上去又卖下来,几回后难免会有点后悔,怎不逢高套利,逢低买进?
有这种心情,也是因为大环境十分不稳定,许多乱局似乎都能影响原本脆弱的股市,深怕自己看错市场,熊市当牛市来办。
投资师父陈鼎武先生不是一直手持大量现金,对市场不看好吗?
投资组合跟进
买入云石机构
现实投资中,我们的一些投资组合,也印证了这种现象,股价起了又跌,要找到像之前合成统一(HAPSENG)那样的一条龙直直升天,以目前的情况,真是难以登天。
我们随便举手上持有的例子,例如环球东方(GOB)、科恩马(KNM)等,都是股价起了又跌,如果我们是循序买进,在股价起时害怕一飞冲天而买多些,就中了它们的圈套,被它套住。
之前商峰(PUNCAK)派了1令吉股息,股价就惨被抛售到1令吉,突然之间它又反弹至1.40令吉,但是要它回升到1.80令吉,一些在1令吉买到的投资者见好就收,赚了几十巴仙套利。
我们最近买的云石机构(DOLMITE),前周还说它回酬不错,上周它就打回原形,跌回我们那时的买价,如果趁它在40仙左右脱售,现在买回来,岂不更好?
由于一些股票我们是打算做短期投资,如果有不错的利润就会脱售,等股价回跌再考虑要不要重新买入。
提到云石机构,既然跌回之前的价位,我们决定再买进2万股(每股33仙)。
套利协德和和合建筑
至于本周我们采取见好就收的策略,是两只最近买入的H股,和合建筑(HOHUP)和协德(HIAPTEK)。
协德在短短时间突破了30仙,我们觉得比买入价(22仙)获利丰富,于是在30.5仙套利,把2万股卖完。
至于和合建筑,因为刚刚和科恩马联合获得国油工程,股价暴涨,我们在周五套利已有点迟,只卖到89.5仙(1万股),比成本价85.75仙仍有约4巴仙的获利。
买进红森
由于这两家公司的企业活动还在筹备中,我们应该会在股价回软时才买入。
手上有了一些资金,我们趁EG工业下滑,再买入其凭单1万股(每股54仙)。
上周,我们买入的R股是特殊收购公司(SPAC)公司红森(RSENA)。我对SPAC情有独钟,累积了前几次的经验,我决定只买母股,这是个包赚不亏的生意,保证回酬至少是46仙,即15%已经在手(成本价40仙)。
这只属于消费股的SPAC,董事部里有许多在饮食业里出色的沙场老将,应该不会失手。
收购活动可能在3至6个月后才启动,如果读者预测股价在这段期前没有作为,可以等多三个月后才买入(希望价位还是一样)。
组合回酬虽有回升,依然是负回酬(-3.1%)。
另外,令我欣慰的是,我们的读者俱乐部的季刊如期在3月推出,没有脱期,迈出艰难的第一步,这里和其余读者共勉。
免责声明
除了股票基本面,本文内容纯属虚构,所有提及股项纯属学术上或经验上的建议,读者若有兴趣投资,应该自行深入研究或询问股票经纪才决定,盈亏自负。我们鼓励通过正确的投资方式创造财富,文中的建议,都有一个完整的买卖纪录。
草根牛马
http://www.nanyang.com/node/754654?tid=687

GKENT盈利暴涨,未来展望好。


Author: koko888   |   Publish date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016, 10:30 PM 

GKENT业绩出炉了,水表部门:季对季营业额上升25.1%至30.94m,对季为24.72m,年对年税前盈利上升19.4%至5.46m,
对年为4.57m。
工程部门:季对季营业额暴涨156%至236.53m,对季为92.50m,税前盈利暴涨183%至32.90m,对季为11.63m,
年对年营业额暴涨69%至432.69m,对年为256.55m,税前盈利暴涨87%至60.76m,对年为32.49m。
GKENT截止31/1/15财政年,净现金达RM105.46m或等于每股净现金为35仙,但是截止31/1/16财政年,净现金暴涨103%至214.34m或等于每股净现金71仙,总负债也从去年的58.35m减少至今年的27.30m,总负债减少了31%,总现金从去年163.82m暴涨至241.64m,总现金增加至47,5%。
公司还建议派股息3.5仙,全年股息达7仙。
GKENT手中工程部合约订单大约还有53亿令吉,截止31/1/16财政年的营业额538.09m,工程部的营业额才达432.69m,试想想看,53亿令吉工程合约订单,可赚多少钱呢?,让我来算算看。
今年工程部门的税前盈利赚14%,那也用14%税前盈利来算,53亿x14%=共赚742m扣除去税务25%=净赚557m,除去股票数额3004100=每股赚185分再除去5年=每年每股盈利可赚37.1分,(除5年是因为轻快铁3工程要在5年内竣工)
若水表部门接下来每年盈利与今年一样的话,每年可赚每股5.9分,再加上associate与joint venture的每年每股0.5分=每年每股盈利达43.5分,用40%净利来派发股息的话,每年派息可达17.5仙,12倍本益比来算,合理价=RM5.22。  
GKENT是我的主力股,虽然赚了不少,但是我还是守着,等待它1-2年盈利大暴发。
(只供参考,若有买卖,盈亏自负)
 

2016年3月29日星期二

Re: OWG gonna explodesoon ?? believe it?? any taker???

KOMTAR — arguably Penang’s best known landmark — will be revitalised to become one of the top tourism draws in the state.


Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said the state wanted to bring back the past glory of the iconic tower.

“At one time, it was the main shopping centre. We want to bring back its shine,” he said after launching the construction of a banquet hall at Level Five in Komtar.

Lim said work was in progress for the rebranding of the 65-storey tower.

“After almost 30 years of neglect, most of the shoplots and office spaces for the private sector have been taken up,’’ he said.

The banquet hall is part of Komtar’s revitalisation initiative undertaken by the Only World Group, which was entrusted with the project by the state government and the Penang Development Corporation through open tender.

Apart from the banquet hall, this project will also include the construction of two external high speed observation bubble elevators.

Levels 59 and 60 as well as 64 and 65 will be refurbished into international-class sky dining restaurants including an outdoor dining area.

Only World chairman and chief executive officer Datuk Richard Koh said the restaurant would be installed with a transparent floor to provide an impression that the patrons were dining in the sky.

Only World has pledged over RM50mil for the project and Koh was confident that it could reap returns from this venture, owing to the state’s growing clout as a tourist destination.

He also spoke highly of Penang’s tourism sector if the state could develop new must-see attractions.





Penang’s Peak


Welcome to The Top at KOMTAR ( Kompleks Tun Abdul Razak ), the tallest building in Penang, and sixth tallest building in Malaysia. Completed in 1986, the tower has become revitalised and now a one-stop destination for the entire family. Home to a plethora of activities, retail and F&B outlets, The Top offers a new pulse to Georgetown all under one roof - and a breathtaking panoramic view of the surrounding island from its summit. That said, if you’re looking for a whirlwind-tour of the best Penang has to offer, look no further than The Top at KOMTAR.



A brief history


Named after the second prime minister of Malaysia - Tun Abduk Razak Hussein - construction of this landmark began in 1974, and it was, at the time considered a great feat in architecture and engineering. In fact, upon completion, KOMTAR enjoyed a short stint as the tallest building in Malaysia.



The Revitalized Icon


The Top @ KOMTAR is a revitalised urban icon which conceptualized and brought to life by Only World Group Holdings Sdn Bhd. Inspired by the strong and silent demeanour of the horse, Only World Group has been working behind the scenes, silently, in bringing people together and creating fond memories until present.



Fun, Food and Good Living


As the Group embraces the philosophy of “Fun,Food and Good Living”, it also make strides in operating and managing F&B and leisure related brands, found in popular resorts and shopping malls.

The Group ventures into good living by providing outlets to relax the body and revitalise the mind namely spas and other related activities. As the future beholds, Only World Group will continue to run ahead in affirming our position of being Only the Best in what we do.

With our experience, coupled with forward thinking leaders, we will implement the best business strategy and system in exploring new horizons to create more sparks that will excite the world in terms of “Fun, Food and Good Living”.


http://thetop.com.my/about-us/

GEORGE TOWN: The Penang Development Corp (PDC) will spend about RM40mil on renovation works at Komtar this year.

 Datuk Ang Choo Hong, chief executive of PDC’s subsidiary PDC Urus Setia, said the works included maintenance of the air-conditioning system and closed-circuit television cameras, upgrading of stalls, parking and structure repairs.

“Renovation works at Komtar need to be done even though they involve heavy spending. The cost will increase in the future if nothing is done now,” he told reporters after a briefing on the renovation works in Penang on Friday.

 He said in 2015, PDC received RM12.3mil in revenue from maintenance fees from tenants of Komtar.





“Every day, over 6,500 people visit the federal and state government offices located in the 65-storey building,” he said. - Bernama

Online Robert168

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 253
    Re: OWG gonna explodesoon ?? believe it?? any taker???
    « Reply #4 on: March 23, 2016, 09:05:29 PM »
    KUALA LUMPUR: Only World Group Holdings Bhd (OWG) expects to complete the project to revitalise the 65-storey Komtar tower in Georgetown, Penang, in the second half of this year.

     The operator of food outlets, water amusement parks and other family attractions, in its announcement on Monday, had said it would use RM48mil from the estimated gross proceeds of up to RM50.17mil from a private placement exercise to fund part of the cost of its Komtar revitalisation project, which has been expanded from the original plan.

     On Wednesday, OWG gave further details to Bursa Malaysia on the revitalisation project that it clinched from the Penang Development Corp in December 2012 (prior to its listing in December 2014).

     The Shah Alam-based company explained that the original Komtar revitalisation project involved the proposed refurbishment and enhancement of five specific levels within Komtar leased to OWG – levels 5, 59, 60, 64 and 65, with a total built-up area of 130,333 sq ft - to create high end commercial space for retail, food and beverages and recreational purposes.





     OWG was granted a 45-year lease, with the option to extend the lease for another 15 years.

    “Subsequently in 2015, additional floor (level 66) and new spaces (levels 3, 4 ,5 and 6) were added to the project which would at least double the total built-up area,” it said.

     On Jan 18 when it announced the private placement, OWG gave the total cost to expand the Komtar revitalisation project as RM180mil, substantially higher than the original plan’s amount mentioned in its initial public offering (IPO) prospectus. The remaining cost of the project, which is expected to turn Komtar into an integrated tourism destination, would be funded via internally generated funds and bank borrowings, it said.